Natural News recently reported on the discovery of the Higgs particle — the “God” particle – saying that it will go down in the history of science as one of the greatest discoveries ever made. But just what was discovered, exactly?
Was it a discovery of a “particle” that grants mass to other elements of matter? Was it the discovery that thousands of scientists focusing on large data sets of apparently random events can successfully skew the results of the data into a “5-sigma” level of apparent statistical significance?
Was this Higgs discovery actually the greatest intention experiment ever conducted? This had definitely been proven not to be just a casual question. This issue reaches into the very nature of science itself– demanding us to ask: can human-run science ever truly be conducted independent from an observer?
The answer, of course, is no. The subsequent question then becomes critical: Do observers alter the outcomes of scientific experiments even without any intention of doing so?
The very thought that observers may have altered the outcome of the Higgs experiment might at first seem ridiculous to scientists who have been monitoring the hunt for the Higgs. Some almost universally believe that the machines running the literally trillions of subatomic collisions operate independently from any conscious observers. The intention of the scientists watching the experiment cannot affect the outcome of the experiment— they insist.
This assumption has become fundamentally incorrect according to the writers at Natural News for the simple reason that all known scientific knowledge has been gathered under a critical selection bias… the “consciousness” bias.
The consciousness within intelligent, self-aware observers has been shown to actually shift the results of seemingly “random” events into the direction imagined or visualized by the conscious observers. According to these new studies – it even happens without a deliberate intention to alter the data.
Higgs researchers are known to have obsessed over visualizing a positive outcome. In this search for the Higgs particle; studies were conducted over a period of many years, involving trillions of “random” events. They used statistical analysis methods to try to spot aberrations that could seem consistent with the behavior of the Higgs particle.
The most interesting part of this experiment—which I have noticed has been completely ignored by almost everyone — including the mainstream media — is that the search for Higgs involved tens of thousands of conscious beings (scientists) who were intently focused on creating a positive outcome.
They wanted the Higgs to be found. They wished for it intently, obsessively, and incessantly. They visualized it, spoke about it, and many even put their careers on the line in the hopes of finding it.
Essentially, Higgs scientists engaged in determined visualization and “intention” activities which, are now being shown by other researchers to have the ability to slightly alter the outcomes of large sets of apparently random events.
Essentially, searching for the Higgs was structured in precisely this context: Large data sets of seemingly random events combed over by CERN scientists who were not actually looking for any physical particle at all… they’re looking for statistical anomalies consistent with what they EXPECTED to find ie; Intention
This CERN study announcement on the Higgs boson discovery is based entirely on “preliminary” data. As CERN says on its own website;
“The results presented today are labeled preliminary. They are based on data collected in 2011 and 2012, with the 2012 data still under analysis. Publication of the analyses shown today is expected around the end of July. A more complete picture of today’s observations will emerge later this year after the LHC provides the experiments with more data.”
What caught my attention the most is: our thoughts do indeed count. They can shape, influence and create. So the motto of the story is: choose your thoughts carefully. Coach Louise Rouse www.planetarycoach.com